Legislature(1999 - 2000)
04/08/1999 01:20 PM House JUD
Audio | Topic |
---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HB 151 - REVOCATION OF MINOR DRIVER'S LICENSE CHAIRMAN KOTT announced that the next order of business is HB 151, "An Act relating to revocation and reinstatement of the driver's license of a person at least 14 but not yet 21 years of age." Number 1108 REPRESENTATIVE ROKEBERG moved to adopt the proposed committee substitute, Version LS0492\N, Ford, 3/30/99, as the working draft before the committee. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CHAIRMAN KOTT, Sponsor of HB 151, Alaska State Legislature, informed the committee that HB 151 was introduced in response to the "Use It, Lose It" legislation which passed four or five years ago. The "Use It, Lose It" legislation would take the license of an underage person caught with the possession of alcohol. Chairman Kott believed that the "Use It, Lose It" legislation has had some unintended consequences. He noted that work on HB 151 has been done in conjunction with the Department of Public Safety as well as the Department of Law. Chairman Kott pointed out that Version N eliminates all references to the youth court. CORY WINCHELL, Administrative Assistant for Representative Kott, Alaska State Legislature, stated that often the "Use It, Lose It" law incurs unintended results. He explained that the desire is to amend the law by requiring consumption of alcohol as a requisite for revoking a license. Currently, there is a probable cause standard which a police officer must find before the revocation of a license. He commented that requiring consumption arose from the inequities that occur with possession. Furthermore, the probable cause standard is a very low finding. Mr. Winchell pointed out that this legislation would remove "consecutive" penalties and run them concurrently. Some teens have accumulated multiple offenses which result in many years of license revocation. Running the penalties concurrently, allows those teens to mend their ways and have their license returned pursuant to good behavior. This legislation removes youth courts, therefore, administrative hearers were authorized to re-issue licenses upon a showing of the following: compliance with the statute and compliance with the title or department regulation. He pointed out that the license would allow the offender to attend school, care for a dependent child, or earn a livelihood without creating a danger to the public. CHAIRMAN KOTT specified that the legislation eliminates the possession. MR. WINCHELL interjected that this legislation does not negate the criminal liability of teens that possess alcohol. Upon a probable cause standard, possession is not the mere requisite for the revocation of a license under this legislation. He pointed out that if an underage person is caught with alcohol, the underage teen can be charged. Mr. Winchell informed the committee, "It was within the purview, that there be about 2,500 revocations per year. That number has jumped to over 4,500 a year." Number 1485 REPRESENTATIVE MURKOWSKI inquired as to why the youth court provisions were deleted. MR. WINCHELL noted that he had spoken with the youth court. The youth court did not want the liability that could be associated with requiring these hearings and reissuing licenses to youth that may end up in accidents. Although the original youth court language was permissive, the concern resulted in the deletion of the youth court. JUANITA HENSLEY, Administrator, Division of Motor Vehicles, Department of Administration, noted that she and Ms. Carpeneti have worked on this issue a great deal. Ms. Hensley passed out a graph produced by the Department of Health & Social Services from the statistical information provided by Ms. Hensley. When the law first passed in 1994, it was estimated that 2,500 licenses would be revoked. It was not anticipated that through 1995-1998, the number would rise to 4,800 arrests. In the calendar year of 1995, there were 2,891 revocations. REPRESENTATIVE CROFT inquired as to whether these statistics refer to when the violation occurred or when the revocation of the license occurred. MS. HENSLEY pointed out that a minor consuming is a violation, that was decriminalized at the time of the "Use It, Lose It" law. The numbers on the first page indicate the numbers of incidents referred to the DMV in order to revoke the drivers license. Ms. Hensley clarified that the numbers strictly deal with the incidents. The last page deals with the number of revoked licenses during those calendar years. The information provided indicates the first offense, the second offenders, and the third and subsequent defenders. She clarified that the difference between the numbers of revoked licenses is due to some incidents being found that the officer did not have probable cause or the individual was under appeal. She pointed out that less than 25 percent of the individuals request an administrative hearing. Number 1718 MS. HENSLEY pointed out the struggle with requiring chronic violators to seek treatment. She requested guidance in that area. Ms. Hensley referred to information from the 1994-1998 Fatality Analysis Reporting System, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and the Alaska Highway Safety Planning Agency which reports that there were a total of 13 crashes with a driver under the age of 21 in 1994. Of those 13 crashes, six were alcohol related. Those 13 crashes resulted in 17 fatalities of all ages and nine alcohol related deaths. In 1998, there were a total of 16 crashes which resulted in 19 fatalities of all ages, but there was only one alcohol related crash. Ms. Hensley said that in some instances, the "Use It, Lose It" law has helped. MR. HENSLEY explained that for a first offense revocation is 90 days, the second offense results in revocation for one year, and the third and subsequent offenses result in an additional three year license revocation. The revocations are currently run consecutively. There are some teens who will not receive their drivers license until the age of 30 or 50. Currently, there is no mechanism in the law which would allow review of those records after a certain time period. Ms. Hensley believed that the sponsor has addressed this issue and developed criteria that if met, would return the license to the teen. MS. HENSLEY informed the committee that there are approximately 450,000 licensed drivers in Alaska of which 10 percent are picked up for drunk driving. Of that, 6.9 percent of the licensed drivers are ages 16 to 20 of which 10 percent of those individuals are being picked up for drunk driving under the "Use It, Lose It" law. Currently, there are approximately 9,400 "Use It, Lose It" revocations for second and subsequent offenders. Of those 9,400 or so, a little more than 700 have drunk driving convictions on their record. She mentioned that she would provide the committee with information regarding those revoked licenses for the "Use It, Lose It" law for their second and subsequent offenses. Number 2008 REPRESENTATIVE ROKEBERG asked if these statistics attribute the second offense to driving without a license or because there is another offense under the "Use It, Lose It" law? MS. HENSLEY clarified that these statistics refer to the second and subsequent offense for minors consuming. There is nothing included in the statistics regarding an additional charge of driving while a license is revoked. She noted that some of these individuals may have an identification card, not a drivers license. She specified that what is being revoked is the privilege to obtain a license. REPRESENTATIVE ROKEBERG believed a huge number of offenders of driving without a license would be created; are there statistics regarding the number of minors charged with driving while license revoked and no valid drivers license. MS. HENSLEY said that she could provide that information. REPRESENTATIVE ROKEBERG stated that the original bill created criminals out of offenders. MS. HENSLEY discussed some examples of those minors with multiple offenses which she believed should be reviewed to determine if those individuals could be helped. She reiterated that there is no mechanism other than screening with regards to whether the minor should attend a program. Number 2124 CHAIRMAN KOTT inquired as to whether Ms. Hensley had any statistics regarding whether those minors with multiple offenses were actually using alcohol or were in the vicinity of an entire group that was picked up. MS. HENSLEY did not have such breakdowns, but did note that she knew that at least one of the minors with multiple offenses was using alcohol. CHAIRMAN KOTT submitted that there are many infractions in which minors were guilty by association. REPRESENTATIVE KERTTULA asked if there was any requirement for alcohol screening at all for these offenses. MS. HENSLEY stated that alcohol screening only occurs at the time the minor's license is reinstated. Before the minor can receive his/her drivers license, the minor must be enrolled in, compliant with and complete an alcoholism rehabilitation program. Ms. Hensley pointed out that there is no monitoring of the minor to ensure the alcoholism rehabilitation program because the program does not go through the Alcohol Safety Action Program (ASAP). ANNE CARPENETI, Assistant Attorney General, Criminal Division, Department of Law, informed the committee that minor consuming used to be a class A misdemeanor in Alaska. Those minors charged with consuming went to superior court and appeared before a judge who would order whatever necessary for that minor with regards to rehabilitation and evaluation. At the time the "Use It, Lose It" law was adopted, minor consuming was reduced to a violation which means that a minor in violation of such receives what is similar to a traffic ticket, goes to district court, and pays a minimum fine of $100. Ms. Carpeneti believed that the rationale for reducing minor consuming from a class A misdemeanor to a violation was that the "Use It, Lose It" law would address the tragedy of alcohol abuse among young people in Alaska by focusing on an area important to a teen, a drivers license. Under the "Use It, Lose It" law, a minor must be evaluated and complete whatever the evaluator suggests in order to have the license returned. Perhaps, those are not appropriate and minors in violation should go before a superior court judge who can order treatment. MS. CARPENETI agreed that the "Use It, Lose It" could use some work in areas addressed by HB 151. The Department of Motor Vehicles does need discretion with minors who have multiple offenses. Ms. Carpeneti supported the provisions in HB 151 which provides the Department of Administration and DMV that discretion; however, she expressed concern with the elimination of the possession of alcohol. She informed the committee that the police do not cite minors who are not drinking. The definition in Title 11 which specifies that the alcohol must be under the minor's immediate control or in their actual possession is used. Currently, the violation for minor consuming includes consuming or possessing alcohol. If the "Use It, Lose It" law is limited to consuming, the program will be gutted. When minor consuming prohibited consuming only, a case could not be proven unless the police officer saw the minor actually drinking. Ms. Carpeneti emphasized that removing possession hurts the effort to protect minors from the effects of alcoholism. TAPE 99-25, SIDE B Number 0001 MS. HENSLEY noted that currently, minor consuming is a violation in which the police officer would write a citation to the minor and order license revocation. The minor is given a copy of the citation which is used as a temporary drivers license for seven days, if the minor has had a driving permit. Within seven days, the hearing must be requested. Ms. Carpeneti informed the committee that she has heard many complaints regarding why the license can be revoked if the case was dismissed. These are officer prosecutions and therefore, the officer cannot always be present in court which results is dismissal of the ticket. Number 0051 REPRESENTATIVE CROFT inquired as to how many minors were age 18 to 21 and how many were under the age of 18. Although that would not make a legal difference, it would seem to make a practical difference. MS. HENSLEY informed the committee that in 1994, the law was in effect only six months, through the first three months of 1998, there were 2,753 revocations of minors 16 and under. During that same time, there were 1,274 revocations of minors age 20 and 1,955 revocations of minors age 18. Ms. Hensely said that she would provide the committee with this information in graph by tomorrow. REPRESENTATIVE MURKOWSKI commented that the "Use It, Lose It" law is not making an impression on minors, if there are minors with multiple offenses. Representative Murkowski did not believe that HB 151 would help because there is not an opportunity for administrative review. The chronic repeat offenders are not being addressed. Is there an opportunity with HB 151 to address those chronic repeat offenders? MS. HENSLEY deferred to Loren Jones, Director, Division of Drug & Alcohol Abuse, Department of Health & Social Services who deals with this on a daily basis and is responsible for all the screening programs. One of the bills passed last year gave the Division of Drug & Alcohol Abuse the authority for screening alcohol programs; however, that was not funded. Number 0218 LINDA WRIGHT, Good Legislation Assures Democracy (GLAD),testified via teleconference from Kenai. Ms. Wright indicated that the changes encompassed in HB 151 do help bring the "Use It, Lose It" law into constitutional compliance, but not all the problems are addressed. Ms. Wright stated that GLAD is a unified group which loves its children, fears for their safety, and is concerned for the constitutional protection of their children. Ms. Wright said that GLAD does not condone under age drinking, but the current "Use It, Lose It" law has become a roadblock to responsible behavior and endangers children's development to responsible adulthood as well as the child's safety. MS. WRIGHT said that her concern for her son's behavior was overshadowed by the loss and abuse of her son's constitutional protection. Ms. Wright discussed the designated driver program which she believed had the rug pulled out from under it by the "Use It, Lose It" law. In response to Chairman Kott, Ms. Wright informed the committee that her son was subject to the "Use It, Lose It" law. DAVID HUDSON, Alaska State Troopers, testified via teleconference from Anchorage. He stated that Ms. Carpeneti had already spoken to his primary concern which is the elimination of possession of alcoholic beverages as a reason for license revocation. This sends a mixed message to minors and law enforcement officers. He said, "Clearly, under Alaska Statute 416.050 which has be decriminalized ... now a violation based upon the use of the "Use It, Lose It" law, it will create conflicts in the administration of that particular law. We would hope that might be given some consideration." REPRESENTATIVE ROKEBERG asked if Mr. Hudson was suggesting that minor possession is no longer a misdemeanor. MR. HUDSON said that is correct; minor possession has been decriminalized to be a violation. The purpose of that decriminalization was to allow the "Use It, Lose It" law to eliminate the criminal prosecution for a minor consuming. In response to Chairman Kott, Mr. Hudson noted that he had not personally cited any minor under the "Use It, Lose It" law. However, Homer police officers and other troopers have cited minors under the "Use It, Lose It" law. REPRESENTATIVE MURKOWSKI inquired as to whether an 18 year old with beer in the back seat of a car would be cited with the "Use It, Lose It"law. MR. HUDSON replied no. He informed the committee that he had attended numerous youth parties in the Homer area and there were large amounts of alcoholic beverages. Only those minors which it could be determined had consumed alcoholic beverages were cited. He added that he had responded to the Vice President of Students Against Drunk Driving who was concerned that the designated driver program would be hurt due to the possibility of the driver losing his/her drivers license. Mr. Hudson did not understand how that could occur. Number 0540 REPRESENTATIVE ROKEBERG asked if the statute mandates that the designated driver be cited or does the officer has discretion. MR. HUDSON explained that if the designated driver has not consumed any alcoholic beverage or does not have control or possession of an alcoholic beverage, that designated driver should not be cited. REPRESENTATIVE ROKEBERG asked what would be happen if there was a six pack of beer in the back seat. MR. HUDSON stated that it would depend upon the circumstances. There could be circumstances in which the open container law could come into play. Mr. Hudson believed that the idea in law enforcement and society as a whole is to curb alcoholic beverage use by youth. CHAIRMAN KOTT inquired as to whether a designated driver with a six pack of unopened beer in front of their seat would be interpreted as the designated driver being considered in control or possession of the beer. MR. HUDSON said in that case, the designated driver would be considered to be in control for the purposes of the law, however there is officer discretion. REPRESENTATIVE CROFT asked what the culpability of the driver would be when there is an open container in the car regardless of if the driver is a juvenile or an adult. MR. HUDSON believed that having an open container, whether the individual is driving or not, is a violation and would be treated the same whether an adult or a juvenile. He acknowledged that there are some mitigating circumstances. CHAIRMAN KOTT announced that HB 151 would be held over to tomorrow. REPRESENTATIVE ROKEBERG commented that he has received more complaints regarding the "Use It, Lose It" law than any other bill passed in past years. Representative Rokeberg said that he supported this legislation. He discussed some instances in which the "Use It, Lose It" law created problems. The committee stood at-ease from 4:02 p.m. to 4:03 p.m.
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|